4.3 Review

Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review

Journal

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.013

Keywords

computer-assisted three-dimensional imaging; image fusion; orthodontics; maxillofacial surgery; surface-soft-tissue; facial skeleton; dentition; review

Funding

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation (STW) [10315]
  2. Dutch Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  3. Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The three important tissue groups in orthognathic surgery (facial soft tissues, facial skeleton and dentition) can be referred to as a triad. This triad plays a decisive role in planning orthognathic surgery. Technological developments have led to the development of different three-dimensional (3D) technologies such as multiplanar CT and MRI scanning, 3D photography modalities and surface scanning. An objective method to predict surgical and orthodontic outcome should be established based on the integration of structural (soft tissue envelope, facial skeleton and dentition) and photographic 3D images. None of the craniofacial imaging techniques can capture the complete triad with optimal quality. This can only be achieved by 'image fusion' of different imaging techniques to create a 3D virtual head that can display all triad elements. A systematic search of current literature on image fusion in the craniofacial area was performed. 15 articles were found describing 3D digital image fusion models of two or more different imaging techniques for orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. From these articles it is concluded, that image fusion and especially the 3D virtual head are accurate and realistic tools for documentation, analysis, treatment planning and long term follow up. This may provide an accurate and realistic prediction model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available