4.6 Article

The inhibitory effect of anthocyanins on Akt on invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition is not associated with the anti-EGFR effect of the anthocyanins

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 1756-1766

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2315

Keywords

anthocyanins; Vitis coignetiae Pulliat; epidermal growth factor receptor; phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt; epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Categories

Funding

  1. National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [0820050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence suggests that anthocyanins inhibit EGFR and Akt activity. However, it is still unknown whether the inhibitory effect of anthocyanins on Akt is associated with the anti-EGFR effect. The effect of anthocyanins on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has not been extensively studied. Therefore, we investigated the effects of anthocyanins from fruits of Vitis coignetiae Pulliat (AIMs) on EGF-induced EMT and the underlying molecular mechanisms. AIMs suppressed the invasion of A549 cells in a dose-dependent manner. AIMs inhibited the phosphorylation of Akt and EGFR, but the inhibitory effect on Akt was not derived from EGFR. EGF re-induced Akt phosphorylation at Thr308 in the AIM-treated cells, but not Akt phosphorylation at Ser473. AIMs also inhibited EMT of cancer cells. AIMs inhibited glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta phosphorylation and beta-catenin expression that are invovled in EMT. We confirmed these findings with transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta. In conclusion, these data suggest that the inhibitory effect of AIMs on Akt activity is independent of EGFR, and that AIMs suppressed invasion and migration at least in part by suppressing EMT by inhibiting Akt activity as well as EGFR. This study provides evidence that AIMs may have anticancer effects on human cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available