4.6 Article

DNA methylation of the p14ARF, RASSF1A and APC1A genes as an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer patients

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 127-133

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1682

Keywords

APC1A; colorectal cancer; CpG sites; DNA methylation; O-6-MGMT; p14(ARF); p16(INK4a); preterapeutic predictor; prognosis; Pyrosequencing (R); RASSF1A; survival; tumor stage; tumor differentiation

Categories

Funding

  1. Orebro County Council, Nyckelfonden, Orebro
  2. Lions Cancerfond, Uppsala

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We quantitated the methylated fraction of CpG sites in the promoter regions of O-6-MGMT, p14(ARF), p16(INK4a), RASSF1A and APC1A in tumor tissue from patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in order to determine if promoter hypermethylation of any of these genes predicts survival. DNA was isolated from 111 primary CRC and 46 matched normal colorectal mucosa samples from the same patients, obtained at primary surgery and DNA methylation was examined by Pyrosequencing (R). Follow-up time was up to 20 years. Patients showed partial promoter methylation in the following frequencies: O-6-MGMT, 34%; p14(ARF), 29%; p16(INK4a), 28%; RASSF1A, 14%; and APC1A, 27%. Normal mucosa was always unmethylated. CRC patients with methylated p14(ARF). gene promoter had significantly worse prognosis (p=0.036), whereas those with methylated O-6-MGMT had significantly better prognosis through the first 60 months post-treatment (RR 0.36; p=0.023). Methylation of one or more of the genes from the set p14(ARF), RASSF1A and APC1A, was significantly (p=0.021) associated with worse prognosis even adjusting for tumor stage and differentiation (RR 2.2, p=0.037). Thus, DNA methylation of the p14(ARF), RASSF1A and APC1A genes, diagnosed by Pyrosequencing, defines a poor prognosis subset of CRC patients independently of both tumor stage and differentiation. O-6-MGMT methylation may play a protective role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available