4.5 Article

Faecal calprotectin levels before and after weight loss in obese and overweight subjects

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 317-319

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2012.38

Keywords

calprotectin; excess body weight; inflammation; weight loss

Funding

  1. Medical Research Foundation
  2. MRC [G116/146] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G116/146] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Faecal calprotectin (FCP) is a non-invasive biomarker of intestinal inflammation, levels of which are reported to be elevated in individuals with increased body mass index (BMI). We investigated whether weight loss (WL), induced by dietary and behavioural change in a community weight loss programme (Slimming World), was associated with a reduction in FCP in a longitudinal cohort study. We obtained paired stool samples at the start and 11-15 weeks into the weight loss programme in 40 individuals with a BMI 425 kg m(-2) and no known colorectal or systemic inflammatory condition. Eight of 40 (20%) 'healthy' participants had a baseline FCP greater than 50 mu g g(-1) (the accepted adult cutoff value for FCP), termed FCPhigh. Although the degree (%) of WL was similar (5.1 FCPhigh versus 6.1 FCPnormal; P = 0.63), only FCPhigh individuals, but not FCPnormal participants, demonstrated a reduction in FCP level (median 0.3-fold versus 1.0-fold (that is, no change) during the study period (P = 0.065). A large prospective cohort study of FCPhigh and FCPnormal obese individuals is now required to determine the relationship between local mucosal inflammation and the systemic inflammatory state associated with obesity, as well as understand the relationship between FCP levels, WL and future risk of colorectal neoplasia. International Journal of Obesity (2013) 37, 317-319; doi:10.1038/ijo.2012.38; published online 13 March 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available