4.5 Article

Predicting academic and cognitive outcomes from weight status trajectories during childhood

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 154-159

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2012.106

Keywords

educational achievement; healthy body weight; childhood; developmental trajectories; longitudinal

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute for Health Research [R0016833]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To identify childhood body mass index (BMI) trajectories and to describe their association with subsequent academic and cognitive outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort: Height and weight measured annually from 4 to 7 years. A mixture of regressions approach grouped children into BMI trajectories (n = 1959 children; n = 5754 BMI measures). Academic outcomes included teacher-rated progress and achievement. Cognitive outcomes measured by Kaufman's Assessment Battery for Children. Academic and cognitive outcomes were regressed according to BMI trajectories, controlling for family and individual covariates. Subjects drawn from Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development (Canada), a 1998 birth cohort (n = 2120). RESULTS: Four clusters of BMI trajectories emerged: two healthy weight groups, one overweight group and one low weight group. Relative to healthy weight, belonging to the overweight or low weight clusters was negatively associated with cognitive and academic outcomes. With the exception of the low weight cluster, this relationship was insignificant in the adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that during childhood being overweight does not increase risk for poor educational outcomes. Instead, being underweight may the increase risk for poorer cognitive outcomes. Further group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) for BMI development over time is needed to confirm results. International Journal of Obesity (2013) 37, 154-159; doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.106; published online 17 July 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available