4.5 Article

The evaluation of AZ66, an optimized sigma receptor antagonist, against methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity and memory impairment in mice

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 1033-1044

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1461145712000831

Keywords

Aopamine; memory; methamphetamine; neurotoxicity; sigma receptors

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [DA013978, DA023205]
  2. NIDA
  3. National Institutes of General Medical Sciences [T32 GM081741]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sigma (sigma) receptors have recently been identified as potential targets for the development of novel therapeutics aimed at mitigating the effects of methamphetamine. Particularly, sigma receptors are believed to mitigate some of the neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine through modulation of dopamine, dopamine transporters and body temperature. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that targeting sigma receptors may prevent cognitive impairments produced by methamphetamine. In the present study, an optimized sigma receptor antagonist, AZ66, was evaluated against methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity and cognitive dysfunction. AZ66 was found to be highly selective for sigma receptors compared to 64 other sites tested. Pretreatment of male, Swiss Webster mice with i.p. dosing of AZ66 significantly attenuated methamphetamine-induced striatal dopamine depletions, striatal dopamine transporter reductions and hyperthermia. Additionally, neurotoxic dosing with methamphetamine caused significant memory impairment in the object recognition test, which was attenuated when animals were pretreated with AZ66; similar trends were observed in the step-through passive avoidance test. Taken together, these results suggest that targeting sigma receptors may provide neuroprotection against the neurotoxicity and cognitive impairments produced by methamphetamine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available