4.5 Article

Evidence for antimanic efficacy of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) inhibitors in a strain-specific model of acute mania

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 1051-1067

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1461145710001495

Keywords

Antimanic drugs; antipsychotic drugs; bipolar disorder; hyperactivity; mood stabilizers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that animal models can be developed to probe the specific domains of bipolar disorder (BD) using the endophenotype approach. Here we tested clinically active antimanic drugs to validate amphetamine-induced hyperactivity in Black Swiss mice as a putative model of the manic phase of BD. We also co-administered a mood stabilizer and an atypical antipsychotic drug in a manner akin to the clinical treatment regimens. Since lithium has been shown to potentially act through glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) inhibition, we evaluated the efficacy of selective GSK3 inhibitors in this model. Habituated animals were pretreated with a compound of interest before being challenged with amphetamine (2.0 mg/kg) and returned to activity cages for an additional 1.5 h. We tested lithium, sodium valproate, carbamazepine, olanzapine, ziprasidone as well as co-administered lithium and olanzapine at sub-efficacious doses. The GSK3 inhibitors tested included indirubin, alsterpaullone, TDZD-8, AR-A014418, SB-216763, and SB-627772. All mood stabilizers and antipsychotic drugs reduced hyperactivity without affecting spontaneous locomotion. While subactive doses of lithium and olanzapine were without effect, their co-administration produced robust reductions in hyperactivity. All GSK3 inhibitors were active in the model, producing selective inhibition of rearing hyperactivity. These data support the predictive validity of the model for the acute manic phase of BD and may have utility as an in-vivo model for identifying novel antimanic therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available