4.5 Article

The selective dopamine D3 receptor antagonist SB 277011-A, but not the partial agonist BP 897, blocks cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 181-190

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1461145709991064

Keywords

Addiction; brain; dopamine; drug discovery; motivation

Funding

  1. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
  2. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the University of Toronto
  3. CIHR
  4. CAMH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dopamine D-3 receptor (DRD3) has been suggested to be involved in the mechanisms underlying stimulus-controlled drug-seeking behaviour. Ligands acting as DRD3 antagonists (SB 277011-A) or DRD3 partial agonists (BP897) have shown some promise for reducing the influence of drug-associated cues on motivational behaviour. Here, effects of SB277011-A and BP897 were evaluated on cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking in rats. The effects of BP 897 on nicotine self-administration under a fixed-ratio 5 (FR5) schedule of reinforcement were also evaluated. SB 277011-A (1-10 mg/kg) was able to block cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking, indicating that DRD3 selective antagonism may be an effective approach to prevent relapse for nicotine. In contrast, BP 897 did not block the cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking or nicotine-taking under the FR5 schedule. In a control study, rats did not respond to the light stimuli without nicotine delivery, indicating that the responding for the drug-associated cues was induced by the previous pairing of light Stimuli with nicotine's effects. These findings validate the role of DRD3 on reactivity to drug-associated stimuli and suggest that the., antagonist, but perhaps not the DRD3 partial agonist, Could be used to prevent relapse in tobacco DRD3 smokers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available