4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Modulation of the cortical processing of novel and target stimuli by drugs affecting glutamate and GABA neurotransmission

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 357-370

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1461145708009334

Keywords

Event-related potential; GABA-A; novelty processing; NMDA; P300

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [T-32 AA 015496-02, T32 AA015496-02, K05 AA 14906-04, R01 AA011321, P50 AA012870-07, K05 AA014906, 2P50-AA012870-07, P50 AA012870, T32 AA015496, K05 AA014906-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we examined the effects of subanaesthetic doses of ketamine (an NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist) and thiopental (a GABA-A receptor agonist) on the event-related potential (ERP) correlates of deviant stimulus processing in 24 healthy adults. Participants completed three separate pharmacological challenge sessions (ketamine, thiopental, saline) in a counterbalanced order. EEG data were recorded both before and during each challenge while participants performed a visual 'oddball' task consisting of infrequent 'target' and 'novel' stimuli intermixed with frequent 'standard' stimuli. We examined drug effects on the amplitude and latency of the P300 (P3) component of the ERP elicited by target (P3b) and novel stimuli (P3a), as well as the N200 (N2) component elicited by both target and novel stimuli, and the N100 (N1) elicited by standard stimuli. Relative to placebo, both drugs reduced the amplitude of parietal P3b. While both drugs reduced parietal P3a and Novelty N2, ketamine also shortened P3a latency, reduced Novelty N2 amplitude more than thiopental, and increased frontal P3a amplitude relative to placebo. Overall, the data suggest that both the GABA-A and NMDA receptor systems modulate P3b and P3a. NMDA antagonism appears to lead to more varied effects on the neural correlates of novelty processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available