4.7 Review

Current investigations into the genotoxicity of zinc oxide and silica nanoparticles in mammalian models in vitro and in vivo: carcinogenic/genotoxic potential, relevant mechanisms and biomarkers, artifacts, and limitations

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 271-286

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S57918

Keywords

carcinogenicity; exposure assessment; genotoxicity; nanoparticles; risk evaluation

Funding

  1. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [10182MFDS991]
  2. Ecoinnovation Project by the Korean Ministry of Environment [412-112-110]
  3. Mahidol University, Thailand
  4. Faculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University, Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are widely used in many sectors, such as food, medicine, military, and sport, but their unique characteristics may cause deleterious health effects. Close attention is being paid to metal NP genotoxicity; however, NP genotoxic/carcinogenic effects and the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. In this review, we address some metal and metal oxide NPs of interest and current genotoxicity tests in vitro and in vivo. Metal NPs can cause DNA damage such as chromosomal aberrations, DNA strand breaks, oxidative DNA damage, and mutations. We also discuss several parameters that may affect genotoxic response, including physicochemical properties, widely used assays/end point tests, and experimental conditions. Although potential biomarkers of nanogenotoxicity or carcinogenicity are suggested, inconsistent findings in the literature render results inconclusive due to a variety of factors. Advantages and limitations related to different methods for investigating genotoxicity are described, and future directions and recommendations for better understanding genotoxic potential are addressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available