4.7 Article

Efficacy of intravenous amphotericin B-polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles against cryptococcal meningitis in mice

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 905-913

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S17503

Keywords

cryptococcal meningitis; polybutylcyanoacrylate (PBCA); nanoparticles; brain targeting

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB707504, 2010CB933903]
  2. Shanghai Commission for Science and Technology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China [09 JC1411902]
  3. Ministry of Education, People's Republic of China [B08020]
  4. Ministry of Health of the General Logistics Department [10Ma022, 2010-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmB), a classic antifungal drug, remains the initial treatment of choice for deep fungal infections, but it is not appropriate for treatment of cryptococcal meningitis due to its inability to pass through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). We examined the efficacy of amphotericin B-polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles (AmB-PBCA-NPs) modified with polysorbate 80 that had a mean particle diameter less than 100 nanometers (69.0 +/- 28.6 nm). AmB-PBCA-NPs were detected in the brain 30 minutes after systemic administration into BALB/c mice and had a higher concentration than systemically administered AmB liposome (AmB-L, P < 0.05); AmB was not detected in the brain. Following infection for 24 hours and then 7 days of treatment, the survival rate of mice in the AmB-PBCA-NP group (80%) was significantly higher than that of the AmB (0%) or AmB-L (60%) treatment groups. Fungal load was also lower when assessed by colony-forming unit counts obtained after plating infected brain tissue (P < 0.05). Our study indicates that AmB-PBCA-NPs with polysorbate 80 coating have the capacity to transport AmB across the BBB and is an efficient treatment against cryptococcal meningitis in a mouse model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available