4.5 Article

CFD simulation of bubble column flows: An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model approach

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 11-25

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.06.008

Keywords

Bubble column; Interfacial closures; Turbulence models; EARSM; BSL; Bubble induced turbulence

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CFD study of flow hydrodynamics has been conducted in transient Euler-Euler environment by using commercial simulation software Ansys CFX 14.0. First, three different wall lubrication force models are compared. Afterwards, the influence of turbulent dispersion force models has been analyzed. Finally, the performance of Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model (EARSM) combined with k - epsilon and Baseline (BSL) models has been tested. Three different combinations of EARSM were included with two cases incorporating the Bubble Induced Turbulence (BIT) as well (i.e. EARSM k - epsilon BIT, EARSM BSL, EARSM BSL BIT). All simulations were compared for average velocity and turbulent kinetic energy profiles with experiments. The performance of these models was also compared with Re-Normalization Group (RNG) and k - epsilon models. EARSM k - epsilon model was unable to capture the axial liquid as well as gas phase velocities close to experimental values. On contrary, EARSM BSL and EARSM BSL BIT were more successful in predicting the velocity profiles and showed good agreement with experiments, with EARSM BSL slightly less accurate in predicting axial velocity profiles. All models predicted the turbulent kinetic energy profiles reasonably good both quantitatively as well as qualitatively, while near the bottom of the column; EARSM k - epsilon slightly under predicted the turbulent quantities. Thus, EARSM combined with BSL and BIT can be effectively exploited for simulating flow fields and turbulent quantities. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available