4.7 Article

Can Aluminum Tolerant Wheat Cultivar Perform Better under Phosphate Deficient Conditions?

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms19102964

Keywords

phosphate deficiency; wheat; Al-tolerance; gene expression

Funding

  1. National Key RD Program [2016YFD0200308]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2015CB150501]
  3. National Science Foundation in Jiangsu Provinces [BK20141511]
  4. Project of Priority and Key Areas, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences [ISSASIP1605, ISSASIP1640]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low availability of inorganic phosphate (Pi), together with aluminum (Al), is a major constraint for plant growth and development in acidic soils. To investigate whether or not Al-resistant cultivars can perform better under Pi deficiency, we chose two wheat cultivars with different Al-responsesAtlas 66, being Al-tolerant, and Scout 66, which is Al-sensitiveand analyzed their responses to Pi deficiency. Results showed that, unexpectedly, the Al-sensitive cultivar Scout 66 contained comparatively higher amount of soluble phosphate (Pi) and total phosphorus (P) both in the roots and in the shoots than Atlas 66 under P deficiency. In addition, Scout 66 exhibited higher root biomass, root volume, and root tip numbers, compared with Atlas 66. The expression of Pi-responsive marker genes, TaIPS1, TaSPX3, and TaSQD2 was strongly induced in both cultivars, but the extents of induction were higher in Scout 66 than in Atlas 66 under long-term Pi starvation. Taken together, our results suggest that the Al-sensitive cultivar Scout 66 performed much better under sole Pi starvation, which sets the following experimental stage to uncover the underlying mechanisms of why Scout 66 can display better under Pi deficiency. Our study also raises an open question whether Al-resistant plants are more sensitive to Pi deficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available