4.7 Article

In Silico Discovery of Potential VEGFR-2 Inhibitors from Natural Derivatives for Anti-Angiogenesis Therapy

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 15994-16011

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms150915994

Keywords

anti-angiogenesis; drug; virtual screening; simulation; VEGFR-2

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81373311, 31300674, 81173093, 30970643, J1103518]
  2. Special Program for Youth Science and Technology Innovative Research Group of Sichuan Province, China [2011JTD0026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Angiogenesis is the growth of new capillaries from existing blood vessels that supply oxygen and nutrients and provide gateways for immune surveillance. Abnormal vessel growth in term of excessive angiogenesis is a hallmark of cancer, inflammatory and eye diseases. VEGFR-2 (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2) dominating the process of angiogenesis has led to approval of therapeutic inhibitors and is becoming a promising target for anti-angiogenic drugs. Notwithstanding these successes, the clinical use of current VEGFR-2 blockers is more challenging than anticipated. Taking axitinib as a reference drug, in our study we found three potent VEGFR-2 inhibitors (ZINC08254217, ZINC08254138, and ZINC03838680) from natural derivatives. Each of the three inhibitors acquired a better grid score than axitinib (-62.11) when docked to VEGFR-2. Molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that ZINC08254217- and ZINC08254138-VEGFR-2 complexes were more stable than axitinib. Similar to bind free energy for axitinib (-54.68 kcal/mol), such for ZINC03838680, ZINC08254217, and ZINC08254138 was -49.37, -43.32, and -32.73 kcal/mol respectively. These results suggested these three compounds could be candidate drugs against angiogenesis, with comparable VEGFR-2 binding affinity of axitinib. Hence findings in our study are able to provide valuable information on discovery of effective anti-angiogenesis therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available