4.7 Article

Receptor-Targeted, Magneto-Mechanical Stimulation of Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 19276-19293

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms140919276

Keywords

magnetic force bioreactor; tissue engineering; mechanotransduction; human mesenchymal stem cells; osteogenic differentiation

Funding

  1. EU FP7 [EXPERTISSUES NMP3-CT-2004-500328]
  2. EPSRC [EP/H028277/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H028277/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanical cues are employed to promote stem cell differentiation and functional tissue formation in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. We have developed a Magnetic Force Bioreactor (MFB) that delivers highly targeted local forces to cells at a pico-newton level, utilizing magnetic micro- and nano-particles to target cell surface receptors. In this study, we investigated the effects of magnetically targeting and actuating specific two mechanical-sensitive cell membrane receptorsplatelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and integrin (3). It was found that a higher mineral-to-matrix ratio was obtained after three weeks of magneto-mechanical stimulation coupled with osteogenic medium culture by initially targeting PDGFR compared with targeting integrin (3) and non-treated controls. Moreover, different initiation sites caused a differentiated response profile when using a 2-day-lagged magneto-mechanical stimulation over culture periods of 7 and 12 days). However, both resulted in statistically higher osteogenic marker genes expression compared with immediate magneto-mechanical stimulation. These results provide insights into important parameters for designing appropriate protocols for ex vivo induced bone formation via magneto-mechanical actuation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available