4.7 Article

A thermochemical study of thiol collector surface reactions on galena and chalcopyrite

Journal

MINERALS ENGINEERING
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 83-88

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.04.007

Keywords

Thiol collector; Surface chemistry; Sulphide minerals; Thermochemistry

Funding

  1. Anglo American Platinum
  2. Impala Platinum
  3. Lonmin
  4. Nkomati
  5. University of Cape Town
  6. National Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism whereby thiol collectors adsorb onto a mineral surface has been widely studied. Most of these studies examine the mineral surface at equilibrium state and, often, well above monolayer coverage. However, the formation of species at the mineral surface is a complex process that is both kinetically and thermodynamically controlled. In a typical industrial application, the dosage of collector will be around monolayer level. This study uses isothermal titration microcalorimetry to measure the heat evolved during the reaction of sodium ethyl xanthate (SEX) and sodium isobutyl dithiocarbamate (SIBDTC) and their mixtures with galena and chalcopyrite. The sensitivity of the instrument allows heats of reaction of sub-monolayer quantities of thiol collector to be measured. The study found that the nature of the reaction between a collector and a mineral surface was dependent on the type of mineral and the type of collector. Proposals are made for the reactions based on previously reported results and the evidence from this investigation. It was found that when collectors reacted with mixtures of galena and chalcopyrite, the magnitude of the reaction was lower compared to that measured for the pure minerals alone. This may be due to galvanic interactions between the minerals, resulting in a passivating effect on one or both of the minerals. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available