4.7 Review

Effect of PACAP in Central and Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 8430-8448

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms13078430

Keywords

endogenous; injury; neuroprotection; pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide; trauma

Funding

  1. OTKA [K72592, PD72240, CNK78480]
  2. Bolyai Scholarship
  3. Richter Gedeon Centenary Foundation
  4. PTE AOK [KA-34039/10-26, SROP-4.2.1.B-10/2/KONV-2010-0002]
  5. Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  6. Arimura Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) is a bioactive peptide with diverse effects in the nervous system. In addition to its more classic role as a neuromodulator, PACAP functions as a neurotrophic factor. Several neurotrophic factors have been shown to play an important role in the endogenous response following both cerebral ischemia and traumatic brain injury and to be effective when given exogenously. A number of studies have shown the neuroprotective effect of PACAP in different models of ischemia, neurodegenerative diseases and retinal degeneration. The aim of this review is to summarize the findings on the neuroprotective potential of PACAP in models of different traumatic nerve injuries. Expression of endogenous PACAP and its specific PAC1 receptor is elevated in different parts of the central and peripheral nervous system after traumatic injuries. Some experiments demonstrate the protective effect of exogenous PACAP treatment in different traumatic brain injury models, in facial nerve and optic nerve trauma. The upregulation of endogenous PACAP and its receptors and the protective effect of exogenous PACAP after different central and peripheral nerve injuries show the important function of PACAP in neuronal regeneration indicating that PACAP may also be a promising therapeutic agent in injuries of the nervous system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available