4.7 Review

Advances in Carcinogenic Metal Toxicity and Potential Molecular Markers

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 9576-9595

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms12129576

Keywords

carcinogenicity; DNA damage; DNA repair; genotoxicity; heavy metal; oxidative stress

Funding

  1. Ministry of Environment, Korea [2010-090001-0083-0]
  2. Korea Research Foundation
  3. Korean Government (MOEHRD) [KRF-2008-313-E00139]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  5. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-0017246, 2011-0004481]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0013571, 2011-0017246, 2008-313-E00139] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal compounds such as arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, mercury, and nickel are classified as carcinogens affecting human health through occupational and environmental exposure. However, the underlying mechanisms involved in tumor formation are not well clarified. Interference of metal homeostasis may result in oxidative stress which represents an imbalance between production of free radicals and the system's ability to readily detoxify reactive intermediates. This event consequently causes DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, protein modification, and possibly symptomatic effects for various diseases including cancer. This review discusses predominant modes of action and numerous molecular markers. Attention is paid to metal-induced generation of free radicals, the phenomenon of oxidative stress, damage to DNA, lipid, and proteins, responsive signal transduction pathways with major roles in cell growth and development, and roles of antioxidant enzymatic and DNA repair systems. Interaction of non-enzymatic antioxidants (carotenoids, flavonoids, glutathione, selenium, vitamin C, vitamin E, and others) with cellular oxidative stress markers (catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase) as well as certain regulatory factors, including AP-1, NF-kappa B, Ref-1, and p53 is also reviewed. Dysregulation of protective pathways, including cellular antioxidant network against free radicals as well as DNA repair deficiency is related to oncogenic stimulation. These observations provide evidence that emerging oxidative stress-responsive regulatory factors and DNA repair proteins are putative predictive factors for tumor initiation and progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available