4.7 Article

Preconcentration strategies in the processing of nickel laterite ores part 2: Laboratory experiments

Journal

MINERALS ENGINEERING
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 269-278

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.03.016

Keywords

Nickel laterite; Preconcentration; Gravity; Magnetic; Roasting

Funding

  1. CSIRO through their Minerals Down Under National Research Flagship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of physical separation techniques for nickel (Ni) laterites have been investigated at laboratory and pilot plant scale and reported in the open literature. These included sink float (or dense media) separation, gravity separation, magnetic separation, electrostatic separation, (roasting) and flotation. The information located so far and reported in the literature review by Quast et al. (2015) suggests that all these techniques, although providing some degree of upgrading, have not been incorporated into full plant operations as yet. The only successful preconcentration technique incorporated into some commercial operations has been the removal of a coarse product containing lower Ni values than the feed. In this work, the application of a number of physical separation techniques (screening, gravity and magnetic separation with and without roasting) has been investigated in the laboratory for upgrading three Western. Australian low-grade Ni laterites (goethitic, siliceous goethitic and saprolitic). Roasting of the goethitic laterite caused a noticeable increase in Ni and Co (and corresponding mass) recovery into the magnetic product with temperature up to a certain point, but this effect was reversed at 650 degrees C. Overall, the application of the selected techniques failed to produce any significant Ni grade enhancement for these three laterite ores. These tests confirm that the complex mineralogy of these three Ni laterite ores compromises any significant upgrading in Ni values by standard physical separation techniques. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available