4.3 Article

Alteration of nanocrystalline calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) at pH 9.2 and room temperature: a combined mineralogical and chemical study

Journal

MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages 437-458

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1180/minmag.2015.079.2.20

Keywords

calcium silicate hydrate; C-S-H; dissolution; kinetics; alteration product

Categories

Funding

  1. French Geological Survey (BRGM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) alteration was studied with flow-through experiments at 25 degrees C and pH 9.2. Three materials with apparent Ca/Si ratios (C/S ratios) of 1.47, 1.38 and 0.86 were investigated. Physical (thermogravimetric analyses/differential thermal analysis), mineralogical (X-ray diffraction) and chemical (electron probe microanalysis, transmission electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry) analyses were performed to characterize the reacting minerals. Initial stoichiometric C/S ratios were 1.22, 1.22 and 0.85, respectively. The excess of Ca is attributed mainly to the presence of calcium hydroxide intimately mixed in with C-S-H particles. The C-S-H chemical compositions were monitored during flow-through experiments in order to determine the mineral stoichiometry needed for reaction kinetics. Under our experimental conditions the stoichiometric C/S ratios decreased continuously with time. A close to stoichiometric dissolution was observed after 2 days of experiments. Using an integrated approach, the kinetics was found to be a function of the C/S. A decrease in layer-to-layer distance in the early stage of the alteration process is interpreted as interlayer Ca/Na exchange (Na being part of the pH buffering solution). A second dissolution step, marked by a close to stoichiometric release of Ca and Si, undoubtedly results from layer dissolution. The structural similarity of C-S-H and tobermorite was confirmed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available