4.7 Review

Pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review for the 2015 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 490-498

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208466

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Amgen
  2. Abbvie
  3. Astra-Zeneca
  4. Astro
  5. BMS
  6. Celgene
  7. Glaxo
  8. ILTOO
  9. Janssen
  10. Merck-Serono
  11. MSD
  12. Novartis-Sandoz
  13. Pfizer
  14. Roche-Chugai
  15. Samsung
  16. UCB
  17. Ablynx
  18. Bristol Myers Squibb
  19. Galapagos
  20. Glaxo-Smith-Kline
  21. Novartis
  22. Novo-Nordisk
  23. Merck
  24. Roche
  25. Schering-Plough
  26. TiGenix
  27. Wyeth
  28. Astellas
  29. AstraZeneca
  30. Augurex
  31. Boehringer Ingelheim
  32. Centocor
  33. Chugai
  34. Covagen
  35. Daiichi
  36. Eli-Lilly
  37. GSK
  38. Janssen Biologics
  39. Otsuka
  40. Sanofi-Aventis
  41. Vertex
  42. Versus Arthritis
  43. Cancer Research UK [18475] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To update the evidence on the efficacy and safety of pharmacological agents in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials comparing pharmacological interventions in PsA: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoid, synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) either conventional or targeted, biologicals (bDMARDs), placebo or any combination. Main outcomes were American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20-50, Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75, radiographic progression, and withdrawals due to adverse events (AEs). Multiple studies of the same intervention were meta-analysed using random effects. Results In total, 25 papers and 12 abstracts were included. The efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (including the recently added golimumab and certolizumab pegol) was confirmed and 16 articles/abstracts focused on 3 drugs with new modes of action: ustekinumab (UST), secukinumab (SEC) and apremilast (APR). All were placebo-compared trials and met their primary end point, ACR20. In 2 studies with UST ACR20 was met by 50% and 44% of patients with UST 90 mg, 42% and 44% with UST 45 mg vs 23% and 20% with placebo, respectively. In two studies with SEC ACR20 ranged 54% (SEC 300 mg), 50-51% (SEC 150 mg), 29-51% (SEC 75 mg) and 15-17% (placebo). In four studies with APR, ACR20 ranged 32-43% (APR 30 mg), 29-38% (APR 20 mg) and 17-20% (placebo). For all three drugs, no more withdrawals due to AEs than placebo were seen and, in general, safety appeared satisfactory. A strategy trial, TIght COntrol of Psoriatic Arthritis (TICOPA), showed better ACR responses with treatment adaptations upon tight control compared with standard care. Conclusions UST, SEC and APR are new drugs with efficacy demonstrated for the treatment of PsA. No major safety signals arise, but long-term studies are needed. This review informed about the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for management of PsA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available