4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

MAGNETIC ACCELERATION OF ULTRARELATIVISTIC GRB AND AGN JETS

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages 1669-1675

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218271808013285

Keywords

Jets acceleration; gamma-ray bursts; active galactic nuclei; pulsar wind nebulae

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002092/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present numerical simulations of cold, axisymmetric, magnetically driven relativistic outflows. The outflows are initially sub-Alfvenic and Poynting-flux dominated, with total-to-rest-mass energy flux ratio up to mu similar to 620. To study the magnetic acceleration of jets we simulate flows confined within a funnel with a rigid wall of prescribed shape, which we take to be z proportional to r(a) (in cylindrical coordinates, with a ranging from 1 to 2). This allows us to eliminate the numerical dissipative effects induced by a free boundary with an ambient medium. We find that in all cases they converge to a steady state characterized by a spatially extended acceleration region. For the jet solutions the acceleration process is very efficient - on the outermost scale of the simulation more than half of the Poynting flux has been converted into kinetic energy flux, and the terminal Lorentz factor approached its maximum possible value (Gamma(infinity) similar or equal to mu). The acceleration is accompanied by the collimation of magnetic field lines in excess of that dictated by the funnel shape. The numerical solutions are generally consistent with the semi-analytic self-similar jets solutions and the spatially extended acceleration observed in some astrophysical relativistic jets. In agreement with previous studies, we also find that the acceleration is significantly less effective for wind solutions suggesting that pulsar winds may remain Poynting dominated when they reach the termination shock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available