4.5 Article

QUANTUM DISCORD AS A RESOURCE IN QUANTUM COMMUNICATION

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS B
Volume 27, Issue 1-3, Pages -

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0217979213450410

Keywords

Quantum discord; fully quantum Slepian-Wolf protocol; quantum entanglement

Funding

  1. Center for Quantum Information and Control (CQuIC)
  2. Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  3. NSERC
  4. Laurier Research Office
  5. EPSRC [EP/H03031X/1, RDF/BtG/0612b/31]
  6. EU Integrated Project QESSENCE
  7. EPSRC [EP/H03031X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H03031X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Physics [0903953] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As quantum technologies move from the issues of principle to those of practice, it is important to understand the limitations on attaining tangible quantum advantages. In the realm of quantum communication, quantum discord captures the damaging effects of a decoherent environment. This is a consequence of quantum discord quantifying the advantage of quantum coherence in quantum communication. This establishes quantum discord as a resource for quantum communication processes. We discuss this progress, which derives a quantitative relation between the yield of the fully quantum Slepian-Wolf (FQSW) protocol in the presence of noise and the quantum discord of the state involved. The significance of quantum discord in noisy versions of teleportation, superdense coding, entanglement distillation and quantum state merging are discussed. These results lead to open questions regarding the tradeoff between quantum entanglement and discord in choosing the optimal quantum states for attaining palpable quantum advantages in noisy quantum protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available