4.3 Article

The Spectral Theorem for Unitary Operators Based on the S-Spectrum

Journal

MILAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages 41-61

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00032-015-0249-7

Keywords

Spectral theorem for unitary operators; quaternionic Riesz projectors; q-positive measures; quaternionic Herglotz theorem; S-spectrum; slice hyperholomorphic functions

Funding

  1. Kreitman postdoctoral fellowship
  2. Center for Advanced Studies of the Mathematical Department of the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quaternionic spectral theorem has already been considered in the literature, see e.g. [22], [32], [33], however, except for the finite dimensional case in which the notion of spectrum is associated to an eigenvalue problem, see [21], it is not specified which notion of spectrum underlies the theorem. In this paper we prove the quaternionic spectral theorem for unitary operators using the S-spectrum. In the case of quaternionic matrices, the S-spectrum coincides with the right-spectrum and so our result recovers the well known theorem for matrices. The notion of S-spectrum is relatively new, see [17], and has been used for quaternionic linear operators, as well as for n-tuples of not necessarily commuting operators, to define and study a noncommutative versions of the Riesz-Dunford functional calculus. The main tools to prove the spectral theorem for unitary operators are the quaternionic version of Herglotz's theorem, which relies on the new notion of a q-positive measure, and quaternionic spectral measures, which are related to the quaternionic Riesz projectors defined by means of the S-resolvent operator and the S-spectrum. The results in this paper restore the analogy with the complex case in which the classical notion of spectrum appears in the Riesz-Dunford functional calculus as well as in the spectral theorem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available