4.1 Article

Investigation of stabilization and destabilization possibilities of water alumina suspension in polyelectrolyte presence

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 34-42

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2014.08.007

Keywords

Polyacrylic acid; Alumina; Suspension destabilization; Polymeric stabilization; Macromolecule conformation

Funding

  1. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7 under REA [PIRSES-GA-2013-612484]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adsorbed polymers show stabilization-flocculation properties of colloidal suspension and they are widely used in technological applications (chemical and pharmaceutical industries, food processing, drinking water purification and wastewater treatment). Thus, the influence of polyacrylic acid (PM) addition on the stability of synthesized alumina suspension as a function of solution pH was studied. The changes of the examined systems stability in time were monitored using the turbidimety method. It was shown that the alumina suspension without the polymer is the most stable at pH 3 (electrostatic stabilization), whereas at the pH values 6 and 9 the systems are unstable (coagulation). The addition of PM with the lowest molecular weight (i.e. 2000) at pH 3 causes large deterioration of the system stability (destabilization by charge neutralization), whereas at the pH values 6 and 9 significant improvement of analogous system stability is observed (electrosteric stabilization). PAAs with higher molecular weights (100 000 and 240 000) cause stabilization of the alumina suspension in the whole range of studied pH. At pH 3 it is rather steric stabilization. On the other hand, at the pH values 6 and 9 the steric mechanism of stabilization is combined with the electric one, leading to electrosteric interactions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available