4.1 Article

The effect of flotation variables on the recovery of different particle size fractions in the froth and the pulp

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 70-77

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2012.03.001

Keywords

Mineral processing; Flotation; Particle size; Froth recovery; Flotation rate

Funding

  1. AMIRA (Australian Mineral Industry Research Association) [P90]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper is concerned with the flotation behaviour of different particle size fractions in a flotation cell and their response to changes in flotation variables. The flotation behaviour of a particle size range can be estimated by using a common tool, flotation recovery versus particle size curve. However, interaction between the pulp and froth phases makes it difficult to differentiate the performance of the collection zone from the froth zone. In this study, a unique device has been used to measure the flotation efficiency of different particle size ranges in both the collection and froth zones simultaneously. Mixtures of fine (60 G silica, d(80) = 72 mu m) and coarse (50 N silica, d(80) = 299 mu m) silica were used as feed. The influence of collector concentration, air flow rate, froth depth, and the ratio of fine to coarse particles in the feed on both the collection and the froth zone behaviour with respect to particle size has been investigated. The results show that the overall fine particle recovery is much higher than for coarser particles and less favourable conditions for optimum flotation efficiency are sufficient. The significance of the froth barrier to coarse particle flotation is also established. The important finding of this study is that the presence of fine particles can enhance the collection of coarse particles both in the collection and froth zones. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available