Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 306-313Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1580
Keywords
minimally invasive surgery; robotic surgery
Categories
Funding
- Northside Hospital
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BackgroundThe feasibility of robotic staging for high-risk endometrial cancer is unclear. MethodsRetrospective review of papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancer open staging (OS) and robotic staging (RS) cases (2009-2011) by two gynaecological oncologists. ResultsThere were 15 OS and 17 RS cases (no conversions). Age, uterine weight and body mass index were comparable, with more stage I RS cases. Operative time (172.5 vs 124.2min, p=0.0005), blood loss (71.9 vs 310.0 ml, p=0.0002), hospital stay (5.4 vs 1.2days, p=0.0016) and lymphadenectomy yield (16.8 vs 10.2 nodes, p=0.0041) were decreased for RS. Optimal cytoreduction rates (100% vs 93%, p=0.2794), follow-up (19.9 vs 27.1months, p=0.2283) and recurrences (three vs five, p=0.5395) were equivalent. Disease-free survival (54.5% vs 66.7%, p=0.5302) and overall survival rates (81.8% vs 80.0%, p=0.9075) were equivalent. ConclusionsRobotic staging is feasible with minimal blood loss, a short operative time and recovery and good optimal cytoreduction rates. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available