4.4 Article

Genotypic diversity of clinical Coxiella burnetii isolates from Portugal based on MST and MLVA typing

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 302, Issue 6, Pages 253-256

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2012.08.003

Keywords

Coxiella burnetii; Human; Animal; MLVA; MST; Portugal

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-SAP/115266/2009, SFRH/BPD/41669/2007]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-SAP/115266/2009, SFRH/BPD/41669/2007] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The temporal and spatial diversity of Coxiella burnetii genotypes associated with human and animal disease in Portugal was analysed using a 6-locus multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) and a 10-locus multi-spacer sequence typing (MST) panel. Fifteen cultured C. burnetii isolates from 13 Q fever patients and a stillborn goat and 6 additional PCR-positive ruminant tissue samples obtained during 2006-2011 were included in this study. Seven MLVA genotypes (types S-Y) were obtained, including 4 new MLVA types (U, V. W, and X), all corresponding to 3 MST profiles (types 4, 8, and 13) previously reported from France and Spain. MLVA types U-Y, all belonging to MST type 4, were found in acute Q fever patients from the districts of Evora, Faro, Lisbon, and Setubal. Different MLVA types were associated with goats from Castelo Branco district (S) and chronic Q fever patients from both Castel Branco and Lisboa districts (S and T), matching with MST types 13 and 8, respectively. In conclusion, a genotypic diversity of C. burnetii consistent with a non-outbreak situation was identified. The involvement of different genotypes in acute and chronic Q fever was found, linking one of the chronic genotypes to goats from the eastern region of the country. (c) 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available