4.5 Article

A Dictionary Approach to Electron Backscatter Diffraction Indexing

Journal

MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 739-752

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1431927615000756

Keywords

electron backscatter diffraction pattern; EBSD; dynamical electron scattering; dictionary matching; maximum likelihood orientation estimates; Von Mises-Fisher mixture distribution

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-12-1-0075]
  2. USAF/AFMC grant [FA8650-9-D-5037/04]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research grant [FA9550-13-1-0043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a framework for indexing of grain and subgrain structures in electron backscatter diffraction patterns of polycrystalline materials. We discretize the domain of a dynamical forward model onto a dense grid of orientations, producing a dictionary of patterns. For each measured pattern, we identify the most similar patterns in the dictionary, and identify boundaries, detect anomalies, and index crystal orientations. The statistical distribution of these closest matches is used in an unsupervised binary decision tree (DT) classifier to identify grain boundaries and anomalous regions. The DT classifies a pattern as an anomaly if it has an abnormally low similarity to any pattern in the dictionary. It classifies a pixel as being near a grain boundary if the highly ranked patterns in the dictionary differ significantly over the pixel's neighborhood. Indexing is accomplished by computing the mean orientation of the closest matches to each pattern. The mean orientation is estimated using a maximum likelihood approach that models the orientation distribution as a mixture of Von Mises-Fisher distributions over the quaternionic three sphere. The proposed dictionary matching approach permits segmentation, anomaly detection, and indexing to be performed in a unified manner with the additional benefit of uncertainty quantification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available