4.7 Article

Algorithms for Estimating Missing Elements of Incomplete Intuitionistic Preference Relations

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages 787-813

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/int.20494

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71071161, 70932005]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [70625005]
  3. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [410208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preference relations as simple and efficient information description tools have been widely used in practical decision-making problems. Intuitionistic preference relation, which is often met in real problems, is usually utilized to provide the experts' vague or fuzzy opinions over objects under uncertain circumstances. Owing to the limitations of the experts' professional knowledge and experience, the provided preferences in an intuitionistic preference relation are usually incomplete. Consequently, how to estimate the missing information in an expert's incomplete intuitionistic preference relation becomes a necessary step in a decision-making process. In this paper, we define the concept of multiplicative consistent intuitionistic preference relation and develop two estimation algorithms. The first algorithm is used to estimate the missing elements using only the known preference values in an acceptable incomplete intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation with the least judgments. The second one is given for the estimation of missing elements of the acceptable incomplete intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations with more known judgments. The advantages of the developed algorithms over the existing one are detailedly analyzed, and some examples are provided to illustrate the solution processes of the algorithms and to verify their practicality and superiority. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available