4.4 Article

Enhanced privacy of a remote data integrity-checking protocol for secure cloud storage

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SECURITY
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 307-318

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10207-014-0263-8

Keywords

Cloud computing; Data integrity; Privacy; Remote data integrity checking

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1135004, 61170080]
  2. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme
  3. Guangdong Institutions of Higher Education
  4. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1117831] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Remote data integrity checking (RDIC) enables a server to prove to an auditor the integrity of a stored file. It is a useful technology for remote storage such as cloud storage. The auditor could be a party other than the data owner; hence, an RDIC proof is based usually on publicly available information. To capture the need of data privacy against an untrusted auditor, Hao et al. formally defined privacy against third party verifiers as one of the security requirements and proposed a protocol satisfying this definition. However, we observe that all existing protocols with public verifiability supporting data update, including Hao et al.'s proposal, require the data owner to publish some meta-data related to the stored data. We show that the auditor can tell whether or not a client has stored a specific file and link various parts of those files based solely on the published meta-data in Hao et al.'s protocol. In other words, the notion privacy against third party verifiers is not sufficient in protecting data privacy, and hence, we introduce zero-knowledge privacy to ensure the third party verifier learns nothing about the client's data from all available information. We enhance the privacy of Hao et al.'s protocol, develop a prototype to evaluate the performance and perform experiment to demonstrate the practicality of our proposal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available