4.7 Article

Adjunctive surgery improves treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages E391-E396

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.018

Keywords

Drug-resistant; Tuberculosis; Treatment; Outcome; Surgery

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Fogarty International Center [D43TW007124, D43TW007124-06S1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To determine risk factors for poor outcomes among patients with pulmonary multidrug-or extensively drug-resistant (M/XDR) tuberculosis (TB) in Georgia. Methods: This was a prospective, population-based observational cohort study. Results: Among 380 M/XDR-TB patients (mean age 38 years), 179 (47%) had a poor outcome: 59 (16%) died, 37 (10%) failed, and 83 (22%) defaulted. Newly diagnosed M/XDR-TB cases were significantly more likely to have a favorable outcome than retreatment cases (odds ratio (OR) 4.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.99-9.10, p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for a poor treatment outcome included previous treatment history (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.29-6.58), bilateral disease (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.20-3.01), body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) <= 18.5 (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.11-3.29), and XDR-TB (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.11-4.71). Patients who underwent surgical resection (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.64) and had sputum culture conversion by 4 months (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.52) were significantly less likely to have poor treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Adjunctive surgery appeared to be beneficial in treating patients with M/XDR-TB. Retreatment cases, XDR-TB, bilateral disease, and low BMI were associated with a poor outcome. Additional studies are needed to further define the apparent beneficial role of surgery in the treatment of M/XDR-TB. (C) 2012 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available