4.4 Review

Accuracy of available methods for quantifying the heat power generation of nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 739-751

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2013.826825

Keywords

Calorimetric methods; magnetic hyperthermia; magnetic methods; magnetic nanoparticles; specific absorption rate

Funding

  1. University of Zaragoza
  2. Banco Santander Central Hispano
  3. General Council of Aragon (DGA)
  4. Spanish CSIC
  5. [E-100]
  6. [UZ2012-CIE-10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In magnetic hyperthermia, characterising the specific functionality of magnetic nanoparticle arrangements is essential to plan the therapies by simulating maximum achievable temperatures. This functionality, i.e. the heat power released upon application of an alternating magnetic field, is quantified by means of the specific absorption rate (SAR), also referred to as specific loss power (SLP). Many research groups are currently involved in the SAR/SLP determination of newly synthesised materials by several methods, either magnetic or calorimetric, some of which are affected by important and unquantifiable uncertainties that may turn measurements into rough estimates. This paper reviews all these methods, discussing in particular sources of uncertainties, as well as their possible minimisation. In general, magnetic methods, although accurate, do not operate in the conditions of magnetic hyperthermia. Calorimetric methods do, but the easiest to implement, the initial-slope method in isoperibol conditions, derives inaccuracies coming from the lack of matching between thermal models, experimental set-ups and measuring conditions, while the most accurate, the pulse-heating method in adiabatic conditions, requires more complex set-ups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available