4.4 Article

Improved hyperthermia treatment control using SAR/temperature simulation and PRFS magnetic resonance thermal imaging

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 86-99

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2010.501509

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [5PO1-CA042745]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA042745] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods: Heating capabilities of a cylindrical radiofrequency (RF) mini-annular phased array (MAPA) applicator were investigated with electromagnetic and thermal simulations of SAR in homogeneous phantom models and two human leg sarcomas. High frequency structure simulator (HFSS) (Ansoft) was used for electromagnetic simulations and SAR patterns were coupled into EPhysics (Ansoft) for thermal modelling with temperature-dependent variable perfusion. Simulations were accelerated by integrating tumour-specific anatomy into a pre-gridded whole body tissue model. To validate this treatment planning approach, simulations were compared with MR thermal images in both homogenous phantoms and heterogeneous tumours. Results: SAR simulations demonstrated excellent agreement with temperature rise distributions obtained with MR thermal imaging in homogeneous phantoms and clinical treatments of large soft-tissue sarcomas. The results demonstrate feasibility of preplanning appropriate relative phases of antennas for localising heat in tumour. Conclusions: Advances in the accuracy of computer simulation and non-invasive thermometry via MR thermal imaging have provided powerful new tools for optimisation of clinical hyperthermia treatments. Simulations agree well with MR thermal images in both homogeneous tissue models and patients with lower leg tumours. This work demonstrates that better quality hyperthermia treatments should be possible when simplified hybrid model simulations are performed routinely as part of the clinical pretreatment plan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available