4.6 Article

Characterization, DBPs formation, and mutagenicity of different organic matter fractions in two source waters

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.07.002

Keywords

Dissolved organic matter (DOM); DBPs formation potential (DBPFP); Umu test; Mutagenicity

Funding

  1. China High-Tech Development Program (863 Program) [2012AA062607]
  2. Urban Environmental Quality and Health Effects, Innovative Team of Overseas Chinese Academy of Sciences Partner Program [KZCX2-YW-T08]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51278482]
  4. Xiamen Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology [3502z20110005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dissolved organic matters (DOM) are critical in the formation of the mutagenic disinfection byproducts (DBPs). In this study, five DOM fractions were isolated and investigated from a contaminated river and a clean reservoir source waters using resin adsorption. The DOM fractions were characterized with excitation-emission matrix, and several typical DBPs formation potentials and the mutagenicity of each DOM fraction were measured. Among these fractions, hydrophobic neutrals (HON), hydrophilic acids (HIA) and hydrophilic bases (HIB) generated the highest carbon-containing DBPs in the river source water, as did HIB and hydrophobic bases (HOB) in reservoir water. Hydrophobic acids (HOA), HON, and HIA were the three most important fractions forming nitrogen-containing DBPs. Following chlorination, the mutagenicity of HON, HIA, HOA and HIB was 1503, 626, 422 and 116 ng 4-NQO/mg DOC in river water, respectively. Only HIA and HOA were mutagenic with 85 and 10 ng 4-NQO/mg DOC in reservoir water, respectively. The soluble microbial products like substances and aromatic proteins contributed significantly to the mutagenicity of river water; whereas the humic acid-like and fulvic acid-like substances were the primary contributors to the mutagenicity of reservoir water. (C) 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available