4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Comparison of several glycerol reforming methods for hydrogen and syngas production using Gibbs energy minimization

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 39, Issue 31, Pages 17969-17984

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.130

Keywords

Reforming processes; Gibbs energy minimization; Hydrogen; Syngas

Funding

  1. CAPES Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, FAPESP - Sao Paulo Research Foundation [2011/20666-8]
  2. CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, Brazil
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/20666-8] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on the comparison of different glycerol reforming technologies aimed to hydrogen and syngas production. The reactions of steam reforming, partial oxidation, autothermal reforming, dry reforming and supercritical water gasification were analyzed. For this, the Gibbs energy minimization approach was used in combination with the virial equation of state. The validation of the model was made between the simulations of the proposed model and both, simulated and experimental data obtained in the literature. The effects of modifications in the operational temperature, operational pressure and reactants composition were analyzed with regard to composition of the products. The effect of coke formation was discussed too. Generally, higher temperatures and lower pressures resulted in higher hydrogen and syngas production. All reforming technologies demonstrated to be feasible for use in hydrogen or synthesis gas production in respect of the products composition. The proposed model showed good predictive ability and low computational time (close to 1 s) to perform the calculation of the combined chemical and phase equilibrium for all systems analyzed. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available