4.7 Article

Co-producing hydrogen and methane from higher-concentration of corn stalk by combining hydrogen fermentation and anaerobic digestion

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 39, Issue 26, Pages 14204-14211

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.089

Keywords

Higher concentration of corn stalk; Bio-hydrogen production; Methane; Two stage fermentation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21171147]
  2. China National Key Basic Research Special Funds [2009CB220005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the high concentration of corn stalk (60 g/L) was employed as feedstock to produce bio-hydrogen and methane by combining hydrogen fermentation and anaerobic digestion. In the first stage of hydrogen fermentation, the effects of several key parameters, such as strain enhancement technique, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), NH4HCO3 on hydrogen production from cornstalk were investigated and optimized. The maximum hydrogen yield of 79.8 +/- 1.5 ml H-2/g-TS and hydrogen production rate of 3.78 ml/g-cornstalk h was observed at fixed acidizing cornstalk of 60 g/L, strains Bacillus sp. FS2011 dosage of 10%(v/v), CTAB of 30 mg/L, NH4HCO3 of 1.2 g/L and initial pH of 7.5 +/- 0.5 at 36 +/- 1 degrees C, respectively. In the second stage of anaerobic digestion, the effluent from hydrogen production bio-reactor was further employed as the feedstock to produce methane by methanogenic bacteria, the maximum methane yield of 227 +/- 2.5 ml CH4/g-COD and COD removal rate of 95 +/- 1% was recorded. The interesting observations were that the total amount of the organic wastewater produced in a higher substrate concentration (60 g/l) by hydrogen fermentation was reduced by about two-thirds compared with that of traditional low substrate concentration (<= 20 g/l). Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available