4.7 Review

Overview on the developments of vapor-feed direct methanol fuel cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 6689-6704

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.002

Keywords

Direct methanol fuel cell; Vapor-feed; Methanol vapor; Water management; System design; Optimization

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013ZM0003]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2013040016899]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51275180]
  4. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures [2013001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct methanol fuel cells have attracted extensive attentions from the fuel cell community because it is regarded as a promising candidate to replace the traditional power sources for portable applications. This technical review specially summarizes the development of the vapor-feed direct methanol fuel cell (VF-DMFC) which exhibits diverse characteristics from the liquid-feed system. This work is to provide a technical reference for engineering practice in the field of the VF-DMFC. Details concerning the system design and operation of active, semi-passive and fully-passive VF-DMFCs are provided. As a special subclass, the situation of high-temperature VF-DMFC is also introduced in this work. For the VF-DMFCs, several primary issues such as methanol, water and product managements and electrode optimization are respectively analyzed. Along with this, the mechanisms and strategies for optimization of each issue are remarked. Considering the significance and contribution of modeling works, such information is individually reviewed. Based on an overall evaluation, the emphases of the future work are also discussed. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available