4.7 Article

Assessment of biotic and abiotic graphite cathodes for hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 1297-1305

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.017

Keywords

Biocathode; Biohydrogen; Energy utilization; Two-chambered MEC

Funding

  1. Spanish Government [CTQ 2011-23632, CTQ 2011-24114]
  2. Catalan Government [2013 FI-B 00786]
  3. Juan de la Cierva Fellowship from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Spain) [JCI-2010-07104]
  4. University of Girona [BTI-12/32]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogen represents a promising clean fuel for future applications. The biocathode of a two-chambered microbial electrolysis cell (biotic MEC) was studied and compared with an abiotic cathode (abiotic MEC) in order to assess the influence of naturally selected microorganisms for hydrogen production in a wide range of cathode potentials (from -400 to -1800 mV vs SHE). Hydrogen production in both MECs increased when cathode potential was decreased. Microorganisms present in the biotic MEC were identified as Hoeflea sp. and Aquiflexum sp. Supplied energy was utilized more efficiently in the biotic MEC than in the abiotic, obtaining higher hydrogen production respect to energy consumption. At -1000 mV biotic MEG produced 0.89 +/- 0.10 m(3) H-2 d(-1) m(-3)NCC (Net Cathodic Compartment) at a minimum operational cost of 3.2 USD kg(-1) H-2. This cost is lower than the estimated market value for hydrogen (6 USD kg(-1) H-2). Copyright (C) 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available