4.7 Article

30,000 h operation of a 70 kW stationary PEM fuel cell system using hydrogen from a chlorine factory

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 4714-4724

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.152

Keywords

PEM fuel cells; Stationary power; Chlorine plant; Fuel cell degradation; By-product hydrogen

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economic Affairs of the Netherlands through the SenterNovem EOS DEMO Program
  2. Ministry of Economic Affairs of the Netherlands through EOS LT Program
  3. European Joint Technology Initiative on Fuel Cells and Hydrogen [256721]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A pilot PEM Power Plant is described utilizing by-product hydrogen from the electrolysis of brine in the Akzo Nobel chlor-alkali plant at Delfzijl, the Netherlands. The performance of this 70 kW fuel cell unit is reported for a period of five and a half years, starting in April 2007. Results of measurements of cell voltages on PEM fuel cells with different types of Membrane Electrode Assemblies are reported for an operational period of 30,000 h. Stack performance is highly dependent on the MEA it contains, leading to a wide variety in reversible and irreversible voltage decay rates. Best performing MEAs enable stack operation of more than 16,000 h of power generation, with an average voltage decay rate of 2.5 mu V/h. The reversible decay is linked to contaminants, primarily at the anode. For the irreversible decay, several causes are possible given the type and duration of the PEM Power Plant operation: loss of catalyst surface area, irreversible adsorption of contaminants, and loss of hydrophobicity. In the absence of detailed MEA characterization, no final conclusion can be drawn. The Balance of Plant components have not been replaced during these 30,000 h. Copyright (C) 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available