4.7 Article

Comparison of structure and catalytic performance of Pt-Co and Pt-Cu bimetallic catalysts supported on Al2O3 and CeO2 synthesized by electron beam irradiation method for preferential CO oxidation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 4456-4465

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.159

Keywords

Pt-Cu; Pt-Co; Bimetallic catalysts; Preferential oxidation; PROX; Electron beam irradiation method

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [22241023]
  2. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (R&D Project for Regional Innovation) [22U5009]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22241023] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to investigate the effect of transition metal addition to platinum with different support materials on preferential CO oxidation, structure and chemical properties of supported bimetallic catalysts prepared by electron beam irradiation method were correlated to the catalytic performance. On Al2O3, decoration of Pt by small amount of Co (Co/Pt similar to 0.03) drastically increased CO and O-2 conversions while addition of equimolar Cu to Pt increased them only above 100 degrees C, where the rate-controlling factor was suggested to change from oxygen transport to CO activation. On CeO2, either addition of Co or Cu to Pt had minor or negative effect on high O-2 conversion inherent to high oxygen transport at Pt-CeO2 interface. On Pt-Cu/CeO2, however, metal-CuOx interface dominates the reaction characteristics to give improved selectivity, which is suitable for deep CO removal in excess O-2/CO condition. The order of selectivity above 100 degrees C, Pt-CoOx > Pt(alloy)-CuOx > Pt-CeO2 interfaces, was derived from structural analysis and catalytic tests. Copyright (c) 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available