4.7 Article

Energy and exergy analysis of microfluidic fuel cell

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 38, Issue 15, Pages 6526-6536

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.046

Keywords

Microfluidic fuel cell; Fuel recirculation; Energy efficiency; Exergy efficiency

Funding

  1. Ability R&D Energy Research Centre, CityU SRG [7002782]
  2. University of Hong Kong
  3. Shanghai Pujiang Program [12PJ1402100]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, P.R. China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microfluidic fuel cell (MFC) is a promising fuel cell type because its membraneless feature implies great potential for low-cost commercialization. In this study, an energy and exergy analysis of MFC is performed by numerical simulation coupling computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with electrochemical kinetics. MFC system designs with and without fuel recirculation are investigated. The effects of micropump efficiency, fuel flow rate and fuel concentration on the MFC system performance are evaluated. The results indicate that fuel recirculation is preferred for MFC to gain higher exergy efficiency only if the efficiency of the micropump is sufficiently high. Optimal cell operating voltage for achieving the highest exergy efficiency can be obtained. Parasitic effect will cause a significant reduction in the exergy efficiency. An increase in the fuel concentration will also lead to a reduction in the exergy efficiency. Increasing the fuel flow rate in a MFC with fuel recirculation will cause a fluctuating variation in the exergy efficiency. On the other hand, in a one-off MFC system, the exergy efficiency decreases with increasing fuel flow rate. The present work enables better understanding of the energy conversion in MFC and facilitates design optimization of MFC. Copyright (C) 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available