4.7 Article

CO2 dry-reforming of methane over La0.8Sr0.2Ni0.8M0.2O3 perovskite (M = Bi, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe): Roles of lattice oxygen on C-H activation and carbon suppression

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 37, Issue 15, Pages 11195-11207

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.059

Keywords

CO2 dry-reforming of methane; Hydrogen; Perovskite; Syngas; CO2 capture and utilization

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore
  2. A*STAR
  3. National Environmental Agency (A*STAR SERC) [092-138-0022, 279-000-292-305, 1002114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

La0.8Sr0.2Ni0.8M0.2O3 (LSNMO) (where M = Bi, Co, Cr, Cu and Fe) perovskite catalyst precursors have been successfully developed for CO2 dry-reforming of methane (DRM). Among all the catalysts, Cu-substituted Ni catalyst precursor showed the highest initial catalytic activity due to the highest amount of accessible Ni and the presence of mobile lattice oxygen species which can activate C-H bond, resulting in a significant improvement of catalytic activity even at the initial stage of reaction. However, these Ni particles can agglomerate to form bigger Ni particle size, thereby causing lower catalytic stability. As compared to Cu-substituted Ni catalyst, Fe-substituted Ni catalyst has low initial activity due to the lower reducibility of Ni-Fe and the less mobility of lattice oxygen species. However, Fe-substituted Ni catalyst showed the highest catalytic stability due to: (1) strong metal-support interaction which hinders thermal agglomeration of the Ni particles; and (2) the presence of the abundant lattice oxygen species which are not very active for C-H bond activation but active to react with CO2 to form La2O2CO3, hence minimizing carbon formation by reacting with surface carbon to form CO. Copyright (C) 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available