4.7 Article

Effects of preparation on electrochemical properties of CoTMPP/C as catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in acid media

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 37, Issue 17, Pages 13082-13087

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.025

Keywords

Electro-catalyst; CoTMPP/C; Oxygen reduction reaction

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21176155, 20776085]
  2. STCSM of China [10JC1406900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon supported Co tetramethoxy-phenylporphyrin (CoTMPP/C) catalysts have been synthesized by ultrasonic-assisted solvothermal method followed by heat-treatment in Ar atmosphere. The effects of preparation, including the solvent used for solvothermal reaction and the heat-treatment temperature, on electrochemical performance of the obtained CoTMPP/C catalysts towards oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) have been comparatively investigated. The results showed that the ORR peak potential could be improved by heat-treatment, it increases with increase in the calcination temperature, and then decreases when the heat-treatment temperature is larger than the optimal value, 600 degrees C, where the best catalytic activity could be achieved. Among the used solvents of glacial acetic acid (HAc), methylene chloride (CH2Cl2) and aqueous ammonia (NH3 center dot H2O), the catalysts prepared with HAc and NH3 center dot H2O demonstrated very close ORR peak potential and transferred-electron number, which are higher than that exhibited by the catalyst synthesized with CH2Cl2. However, considering from points of ORR peak potential, transferred-electron number, synthesis convenience and environmental adaption, we suggest that glacial acetic acid is the optimal solvent to prepare high performance CoTMPP/C catalyst for ORR. Copyright (C) 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available