4.7 Article

Thermodynamics research on hydrogen production from biomass and coal co-gasification with catalyst

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 36, Issue 18, Pages 11676-11683

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.064

Keywords

Biomass; Hydrogen; Gasification; Calcium oxide

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2008GB2C100099]
  2. Science and Technology Support Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2008051]
  3. Power Machinery Clean Energy and Application of Key Laboratory Projects of Jiangsu Province [QK09005]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Suzhou Province [040105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A model comprises two sub-models, i.e. combustion and gasification models, is developed to simulate a single fluidized bed two-step gasification process and to predict H-2 production under different conditions. The combustion sub-model which consists of volatile precipitation and char combustion sub-models. The combustion sub-model is used to forecast residual char. The gasification sub-model, based on the mass and energy balance, is used to examine thermodynamically the effect on the hydrogen production of calcium oxide as the catalyst. Moreover, the effects of the operational conditions on the hydrogen production such as biomass/coal (mass ratio), temperature, steam/coke, and calcium/coke, are simulated. The results indicate that the addition of calcium oxide at certain conditions can significantly improve hydrogen production and lower the required temperature for gasification. The model predicts that the maximum hydrogen production of 60% can be achieved under the conditions of temperature in the range of 800-850 degrees C, calcium/coke, steam/coke, and coal/biomass (mass ratio) are 0.5, 1.8, and 1/4, respectively. The model predictions are in good agreement with the experimental data. Copyright (C) 2011, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available