4.7 Article

Cold start characteristics of proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 36, Issue 18, Pages 11832-11845

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.101

Keywords

Cold start; Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC); In-situ experiments; Current and temperature distributions; Ice formation

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [350662-07]
  2. Auto21
  3. Chinese Government
  4. Next Energy Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the effects of the start-up temperature, load condition and flow arrangement on the cold start characteristics and performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) are investigated through in-situ experiments with the simultaneous measurements of the current and temperature distributions. Rather than the commonly recognized cold start failure mode due to the ice blockage in cathode catalyst layer (CL), another failure mode due to the ice blockage in flow channel and gas diffusion layer (GDL) leading to significantly high pressure drop through cathode flow field is observed at a start-up temperature just below the lowest successful start-up temperature. Three ice formation mechanisms are proposed, corresponding to the ice formations in cathode CL, GDL and flow channel. The general distributions of current densities and temperatures during the constant current cold start processes are similar to the constant voltage cold start processes, except that the temperatures at the end of the constant current cold start processes are more evenly distributed over the active reaction area because of the increased heat generation rates. The cold start characteristics are mainly dominated by the cathode flow, and changing the flow arrangement has unimportant impact on the cold start performance. Copyright (C) 2011, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available