4.7 Article

A comparative study of H2S poisoning on electrode behavior of Ni/YSZ and Ni/GDC anodes of solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 35, Issue 22, Pages 12359-12368

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.067

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cells; Sulfur tolerance; Ni/YSZ anodes; Ni/GDC anode; Polarization performance; Microstructure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of sulfur poisoning on the activity and performance of Ni/Y2O3-ZrO2 (Ni/YSZ) and Ni/Gd2O3-CeO2 (Ni/GDC) cermet anodes of solid oxide fuel cells has been examined by polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements at 800 C The anodes are alternately polarized in pure H-2 and H2S containing H-2 fuels with H2S concentration gradually increased from 5 ppm to 700 ppm at 200 mA cm(-2) for 2 h The results show that the anode potential of Ni/YSZ electrodes measured in pure H-2 decreases from 0 61 V to 0 34 V after exposure to H2S containing H-2 fuels with H2S concentration increased from 5 to 700 ppm On the other hand the anode potential of Ni/GDC electrodes measured in pure H-2 decreases from 0 78 V to 0 72 V under identical test conditions The degradation in performance for the hydrogen oxidation in H2S containing H-2 fuels is substantially smaller on Ni/GDC anodes as compared to that on Ni/YSZ anodes Similar trend is also observed for the change of the electrode polarization resistance for the hydrogen oxidation reaction on the Ni/YSZ and Ni/GDC anodes after exposure to H2S containing H-2 fuels The SEM results indicate the structure modification of Ni/YSZ anodes only occurs on Ni particles and in the case of Ni/GDC anodes structural modification on both Ni and GDC phases occurs The mixed ionic and electronic conductivity of GDC phase could be the primary reason for the high sulfur tolerance of the Ni/GDC cermet anodes (C) 2010 Professor T Nejat Veziroglu Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available