4.7 Article

Life cycle assessment of processes for hydrogen production. Environmental feasibility and reduction of greenhouse gases emissions

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 1370-1376

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.053

Keywords

Life cycle assessment; Methane; Reforming; CO2 capture and storage; Pyrolysis

Funding

  1. Comunidad de Madrid (Spain) [S-0505/ENE/000404]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Decomposition of CH4 (natural gas) is one of the alternatives under study to achieve the sustainable production of hydrogen. No CO2 or other greenhouse gases emissions are produced in this route and carbon is obtained as a solid co-product at the end of the reaction (CH4 reversible arrow C + 2H(2)). This process can be thermally or catalytically conducted and recent studies have demonstrated that the carbon obtained in the reaction can also show catalytic activity. In this work, thermal and autocatalytic decomposition of methane were studied and compared with the steam reforming with and without CO2 capture and storage from an environmental point of view, using life cycle assessment (LCA) tools. As well, different energetic scenarios were included in the study. The selected functional unit was 1 Nm(3) of hydrogen and the LCA was focused on material and raw materials acquisition and manufacturing stages. The assessment was carried out with SimaPro 7.1 software by using Eco-indicator 95 method. Results showed that autocatalytic decomposition is the most environmental-friendly process for hydrogen production since presented the lowest total environmental impact and CO2 emissions. Also, steam reforming with CO2 capture and storage led to lower CO2 emissions but higher total environmental impact than conventional steam reforming. (C) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available