4.7 Article

Hydrogen production from two-step steam methane reforming in a fluidized bed reactor

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 1301-1309

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.062

Keywords

Hydrogen production; Steam methane reforming; Chemical looping; Iron oxides; Fluidization

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A1907] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the chemical looping (CL) concept, two-step steam methane reforming (SMR) system with a reduction/oxidation (redox) reaction of iron oxides to produce pure hydrogen is proposed. This system consists of fuel reactor (FR) and steam reactor (SR). The feasibility of producing pure hydrogen without any purifying steps in SR and the synthetic gas (syngas, CO + H-2) to the Fisher-Tropsch reaction in FR was evaluated. The effect of reaction temperature on the redox reactivity of iron oxides was determined in thermo-gravimetric analyzer (TGA) and the effects of gas velocity and reactant concentration on the reactivity at the isothermal condition in a fluidized bed reactor were determined. The conversion range of the optimum reaction (FeO -> Fe3O4) in the two-step SMR system is found to be from 0 to 0.5 based on the iron oxides. In this condition, hydrogen (H-2) With CO-free and synthetic gas (syngas) having the H-2/(2CO + 3CO(2)) molar ratio of 0.65 can be obtained in SR and FR, respectively. The solid inventory ratio of FR to SR to compensate the difference of reaction rates in the redox system of FeO/Fe3O4 is determined to be 2.9. (C) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available