4.7 Article

Hydrogen production by auto-thermal reforming of ethanol over nickel catalysts supported on Ce-modified mesoporous zirconia: Effect of Ce/Zr molar ratio

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 33, Issue 19, Pages 5052-5059

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.084

Keywords

Hydrogen; Auto-thermal reforming; Ethanol; Mesoporous zirconia; Ceria

Funding

  1. Seoul Renewable Energy Research Consortium
  2. RCECS (Research Center for Energy Conversion and Storage [R11-2002-102-00000-0]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A1903, R11-2002-102-01001-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ce-modified mesoporous zirconia (Zr-Ce-X) supports were prepared by a templating sol-gel method with a variation of Ce/Zr molar ratio (X). 20 wt% Ni catalysts supported on Zr-Ce-X (X=0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9) were then prepared by an incipient wetness impregnation method for use in hydrogen production by auto-thermal reforming of ethanol. The effect of Ce/Zr molar ratio (X) on the catalytic performance of Ni/Zr-Ce-X (X - 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9) catalysts was investigated. All the Ni/Zr-Ce-x (X = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9) catalysts exhibited complete conversion of ethanol at 500 degrees C, while product distributions over the catalysts were different depending on the Ce/Zr molar ratio (X). Hydrogen selectivity over Ni/Zr-Ce-X (X - 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9) catalysts showed a volcano-shaped curve with respect to Ce/Zr molar ratio (X). Among the catalysts tested, Ni/Zr-Ce-0.7 showed the best catalytic performance in hydrogen production by auto-thermal reforming of ethanol. (C) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available